Apply federal research rules on deception to misleading health information: an example on smokeless tobacco and cigarettes.

نویسندگان

  • Lynn T Kozlowski
  • Richard J O'Connor
چکیده

Public Health Reports / May–June 2003 / Volume 118 187 Two respected agencies of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)—the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)— have maintained websites which have erroneously reported that smokeless tobacco is not safer than cigarettes.1,2 This claim is not supported by science and acts unethically to mislead readers of these websites.3–10 Although others have examined ethical issues in health communication,11–15 we think these scholars did not go far enough. We think that the explicit ethical standards embodied in current federal regulations for deception in research should be applied to judge deceptive or misleading information in health communication interventions.16 The term deception usually refers to intended acts of deception; regardless of intention, however, erroneous information can cause the recipient to be deceived about the true state of affairs. The misleading health information on smokeless tobacco fails to meet the government criteria against deception in research. First, the misleading information may have adverse effects on some individuals (e.g., those who switch to cigarettes or fail to switch from cigarettes because they think they are not more dangerous than smokeless). Second, individuals have a right to know about the dramatically different dangers of smokeless tobacco and cigarettes. Third, there are alternative communication strategies that could be employed to inform people of the risks of both products. And, finally, such misleading information would be unallowable because it is not linked to debriefing. This article reviews the misleading information on the governmental websites, shows how modern ethical rules against deception can be applied to health information, and argues that providing information about the comparative risks of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco is the least evasive and most ethical course of action.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

First, tell the truth: a dialogue on human rights, deception, and the use of smokeless tobacco as a substitute for cigarettes.

The use of smokeless tobacco as a substitute for cigarettes raises many scientific and ethical issues, as the fictitious discussion below reveals.

متن کامل

Regulations restricting the sale and distribution of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco to protect children and adolescents. Final rule.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is reissuing a final rule restricting the sale, distribution, and use of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco. As required by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (Tobacco Control Act), FDA is issuing a final rule that is identical to the provisions of the final rule on cigarettes and smokeless tobacco published by FDA in 1996, with certain re...

متن کامل

Smokers' and e-cigarette users' perceptions of modified risk warnings for e-cigarettes

The 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act opened the possibility for tobacco companies to apply to market their products as having "modified" or reduced risks. However, research on how to communicate comparative tobacco risks and how such messages are interpreted is limited. This study aimed to qualitatively examine perceptions of potential modified risk statements presented as...

متن کامل

Perceived Relative Harm of Selected Cigarettes and Non-Cigarette Tobacco Products—A Study of Young People from a Socio-Economically Disadvantaged Rural Area in Poland

The perceived health risk of recently introduced nicotine and tobacco products may influence both their uptake and continued use. The aim of the study was to assess how adolescents rate relative harmfulness of slim and menthol cigarettes, water pipes, e-cigarettes, and smokeless tobacco compared to regular cigarettes. Cross-sectional survey data from students aged 13-19 years from Piotrkowski d...

متن کامل

India: advocates hit back at smokeless industry.

Tobacco control advocates in India who have been active for more than two decades, together with a few ageing colleagues from the west, will remember the sweat and toil of trying to kick-start a self-sustaining and viable Indian tobacco control movement in the 1980s. The switchback ride from optimism to disappointment , the new dawns and false starts, the workshop sessions shouted against noisy...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Public health reports

دوره 118 3  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003